Two. After reading the work by Lessig, I find it interesting to see how Wikipedia is working to create and sustain its self as a credible source for expert information. I find what Megan said about expertise and Wikipedia as generally true as we tend to not regard the site as too terribly credible. I do see how Wikipedia can be utilized by people who truly are experts in a field or on a subject, as an outlet to share their knowledge with others. Understanding how the system works is important, as we have seen people do not update information for compensation. Instead, people with knowledge in an area update and edit information because they find themselves as the expert in the area, or for fun as sort of a recreation. For example, many people may not regard myself as the expert on much but you could see how my life-long experiences would make me seemingly suited to add my information on the town I know so much about.
Three. The Bilton work is interesting for shedding light on the pure amount of sharing and researching we are doing everyday and don't even necessarily know it. When I first started reading the article I was thinking, oh I don't waste my time scouring the web searching for material and passing it on to others. As I continued reading I thought more about it and realized I too am guilty of this practices. Thinking about how many pages, blogs, and videos I have exchanged with friends and family over the internet just today. Wow, how interesting to think that I too am gathering and spreading vast amounts of information all the time. For me it seems to be another way to create a sense of community, and shared meaning with friends and family. From reading a post on gender and restroom signs posted by my sister, to sharing funny videos with and from friends. We do this because it stimulates our connection with others while providing an outlet for the recreational work that we do.
No comments:
Post a Comment